AllAfrica (24.03.2017) – http://bit.ly/2mSr74h – For 20 years, Nasrin Hoosain* was a supportive wife and mother. She left her studies and job opportunities to build her family, raise their children and support her husband as he climbed the career ladder.
When, after years of abuse and infidelity, he asked for a divorce, she was the one who faced an uncertain future, without financial stability and the risk of homelessness.
Muslim marriage – known as a nikah – is not legally recognised in South Africa, meaning Hoosain, like other muslim women, is not entitled by law to the assets accrued with her husband in the two decades of their union.
She joined dozens of women who lined up outside the Western Cape High Court this week, calling for nikahs to be declared legally valid. This would allow recourse for wives who can be left penniless when the marriage dissolves.
The class action is expected to be heard on August 28, three years after the Women’s Legal Centre first brought its case.
It argues that once customary marriages were given full legal recognition, the historical basis for not recognising polygynous marriages fell away.
Legislation is therefore needed to recognise Muslim marriages, the WLC says.
Muslim marriages allow for up to four wives, but come with the responsibility of providing equally to each spouse. It is not commonly practiced because of the difficulty in maintaining this, research has found.
The non-profit legal centre contends that legal protection has been denied to Muslim women 16 years after the Constitution came into force. This had resulted in widespread oppression and gender discrimination in areas such as divorce, the duties of support, parental rights and responsibilities, and inheritance.
For Hoosain, the end of her marriage meant starting over after years of living a financially comfortable life.
She had been a student when she tied the knot, and dropped out of university to see to their home after having their first born.
“I was a full time mom – a cook, a doctor, a nurse and a taxi driver, all in one,” she said.
Hoosain put her own prospects on hold to “build a successful family”, despite facing ill-treatment from her husband at home.
When he asked her for a Talaq – which in Islamic terms is a divorce prompted by the man as a formal repudiation of his wife – she didn’t put up a fight.
For three months, her husband was forced to maintain her, but once the process was finalised, she was without an income.
“As a wife, I gave such a lot of myself to him over the years. All I got in return was a ‘thank you, ma’am, for your services rendered; off you go,” Hoosain recalls.
As they did not have a civil union, her husband was not recognised as such in the eyes of the law.
He therefore did not legally have to split their assets accrued over the 20 years, or give her spousal support. She however refused to do the “normal thing” and move out of the house she helped him build.
“I had done my research, so I knew he couldn’t force me to leave. Both of us had worked ourselves up, both of us had made sacrifices for what we had. I put my foot down and told my children that we couldn’t be put out, showing them what our country’s laws state and referring to passages in the Quran. Eventually he left, but not without a fight.”
Hoosain has an English version of the religious text of Islam, marked with pink sticky notes, as well as South African law documents which she refers to, to substantiate her arguments.
Life has been difficult since her marriage dissolved, Hoosain admits, as she relies on her ex-husband for money to support their minor children.
She doesn’t want to approach the courts for child maintenance, describing the process as “soul destroying”.
“So I am at his mercy. Whatever he decides to give is what I just have to take,” she explains, resigned.
Her career prospects are limited as she does not have work experience, and her age, 40, also puts her at a disadvantage.
But unlike some of her Muslim friends who were forced to “take what their husbands offered to placate them, which is usually next to nothing”, Hoosain has instituted legal proceedings to force him to cough up.
She declined to disclose the details of her case as it is still before the courts.
Had her marriage been legally recognised, the traumatising reality of divorce would have been somewhat easier, Hoosain insists. The non-recognition of the union is against her human rights.
“It is unfair, discriminatory and prejudicial. We live in a secular country in which we are legally protected from any form of discrimination. Why are Muslim marriages excluded from that?”
The devout Muslim says her issue is not with the teachings of Islam, but with the cultural interpretation which is “not in line” with the Quran.
“Islam is a fair religion, which promotes equality. It even says in the Quran that in case of divorce, separate on equitable terms. This means it must be fair, just and equal.
“Why should a woman have to give up her lifestyle in the event of a divorce? Building what you have takes two people; why does only one get everything?”
Had she known what awaited her later, she would have insisted on a civil union, Hoosain admits.
‘This is our fight’
“You, as a woman, are not protected otherwise. This is both a religious and human rights issue. Islam teaches you to stand firm in what you believe is the truth; to fight oppression, injustice and tyranny. We can’t just sit and take it.
“Women need to be respected. When men refuse to give you your fair share, it’s a sign of disrespect. You give the best years of your life to your marriage and building a family [but have no recourse if the marriage dissolves]. It’s unfair.”
The recognition of customary marriages, which allows for more than one wife, should also extend to Muslims, she argues.
Polygamy is not common in Islam, Hoosain says, as the Quran teaches that you have to treat both equally, from physical assets to emotional support.
“It’s allowed, but virtually impossible to maintain multiple wives equally,” she says.
The class action is an important step toward protecting the rights of Muslim women, Hoosain believes.
“Our voices need to be heard; we are part of South African society. This is our fight so that our daughters can have a better life and not be left destitute in the event of divorce,” she says.
Judges Siraj Desai, Gayaat Salie-Hlophe and Nolwazi Boqwana are expected to preside over the matter.
*Not her real name
If you want to be regularly informed about different violations of human rights in the world, click here for a free subscription to our newsletters!
HRWF database of news and information on over 70 countries: http://hrwf.eu/newsletters/womens-rights-gender-equality/
List of hundreds of documented cases of believers of various faiths in 20 countries: http://hrwf.eu/forb/forb-and-blasphemy-prisoners-list/