Researchers found out it is not a fatwa but only the opinion of several ulemas


HRWF (20.02.2017) – We recently reported some information published by Christian Today (but also by La Croix and other Catholic media) according to which the High Religious Committee of Morocco had retracted a previous ruling making apostasy from Islam punishable by death and had said that Muslims may now change their religion.


This information is however questioned by the website The Superior Council of the Ulemas in Morocco has not changed its position on apostasy, according to the website (


The original source of this news had been Morocco World News which published an article on 6th February entitled “Morocco’s High Religious Committee Says Apostates Should Not Be Killed” ( in which a document titled “The Way of the Scholars” had been distributed on the occasion of a recent ordinary session of the Council (See below). Upstream, another source was identified by Alyaoum 24 as being the website of  Islam Maghribi which covers news on Islam in Morocco. Islam Maghribi said on 4th February that the Superior Council of the Ulemas had allegedly changed its position on apostasy but it was to be taken “for what it is worth”. Indeed, it argued that “The Way of the Scholars” was only the opinion of a number of ulemas, was not a fatwa and was distributed in the margins of the ordinary session. Islam Maghribi also quotes Mohamed Yssef, secretary general of the Council, who would have clarified that it is not an official document of the Council but the expression of opinions and several scenarios raised during the work of the members of the Council. » See hereafter the wrong news that was referred to by the international media.


Wrong News: Morocco’s High Religious Committee Says Apostates Should Not Be Killed


Casablanca (6 February 2017)Morocco’s High Religious  Committee has retracted its Islamic ruling stating that apostasy is punishable by death and has decided to permit Muslims to change their religion.


The High Religious Committee in charge of issuing Fatwas (Islamic rulings) released a book in 2012 where it articulated its position on apostasy and argued that a Muslim who changes his or her religion should be punished with death, drawing on a widespread jurisprudence tradition.


Recently, however, the same entity issued a document titled “The Way of the Scholars,” in which it backtracked on its position of killing apostates. Instead, it redefined apostasy not as a religious issue but as a political stand more closely aligned with “high treason.”


The view that the apostate should not be killed in Islam is not a new one and can be found in the teachings of Sufyan al-Thawri in the first century AH. The scholar reviewed historical situations where the prophet Mohammed acted on the ruling, as opposed to the times he did not order the killing of the apostates. He concluded that killings occurred for political purposes and were not decisions based on religion. The apostates could, theoretically, disclose the secrets of the then fragile Islamic nation.


The reasons behind  Morocco’s High Religious Committee’s change in position are not different from those advocated by Sufyan al-Thawri. Their newly released statement says:


“The most accurate understanding, and the most consistent with the Islamic legislation and the practical way of the Prophet, peace be upon him, is that the killing of the apostate is meant for the traitor of the group, the one disclosing secrets, […] the equivalent of treason in international law.”


The High Religious Committee presented the Prophet’s statement that “whoever changes his religion, kill him” in the light of his explanation “the one who leaves his religion and abandons his people.” The statement further explains that, at the time of continuous wars against the Islamic revolution in Arabia, apostates represented the threat of disclosing the secrets of new Ummah to its many enemies.


The document went on to explain that during the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, Prophet Mohammed himself observed the provisions stating that whomever became a Muslim and renounced it must be allowed to return to Quraich, the Muslim nations’ most powerful enemy at the time. When a Bedouin decided to leave Islam after the Treaty, therefore, the prophet simply let him go.


Using Islam’s primary source of legislation, the High Religious Committee stated that the Quran talks in many instances about apostasy and its punishment in the hereafter, without mentioning any punishment in this life as in Chapter 2 verse 217 that says:  “And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the companions of the Fire, they will abide therein eternally.”


The document also explained that the famous Wars of Apostasy launched by Abu Bakr as-Siddiq, the Muslims world’s first Caliph, were in line with his effort to keep the newly established state together and fight all sorts of internal divisions. This was a decision based on political reasoning rather than by religious motivations.





If you want to be regularly informed about different violations of human rights in the world, click here for a free subscription to our newsletters! 


HRWF database of news and information on over 70 countries: 
List of hundreds of documented cases of believers of various faiths in 20 countries:  

HTML Snippets Powered By :